Sumo de Pêssego e Uva vs Ribena
Overall, Ribena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Sumo de Pêssego e Uva | Ribena |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 55 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 11.8 g | 4.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ribena has 62% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 55 kcal).
- Ribena has 61% less sugar (4.6 g vs 11.8 g).
- Sumo de Pêssego e Uva has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Sumo de Pêssego e Uva
55% polme de pêssego, 45% sumo de uva obtido apartir de um produto concentrado.
Ribena
Water Blackcurrant Juice from Concentrate (22%), Sugar, Thickener (Polydextrose, Acidity Regulator (Sodium Gluconate, Acid (Citric Acid), Vitamin C, Extracts of Carrot and Hibiscus, Natural Blackcurrant Flavourings Preservatives (Potassium Sorbate, Sodium Bisulphite), Sweeteners (Acesulfame K, Sucralose) 1 No artificial flavours or 5054267 003460 1023 192
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sumo de Pêssego e Uva or Ribena?
Overall, Ribena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ribena has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 55 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ribena has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 11.8 g per 100 g.