Sumo de Pêssego e Uva vs Fruit & Barley Summer Fruits
Overall, Fruit & Barley Summer Fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Sumo de Pêssego e Uva
Fruit & Barley Summer Fruits
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Sumo de Pêssego e Uva | Fruit & Barley Summer Fruits |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 55 kcal | 5 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 11.8 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | — |
| Additives | 0 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | Apple, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruit & Barley Summer Fruits has 91% fewer calories (5 kcal vs 55 kcal).
- Fruit & Barley Summer Fruits has no sugar, while Sumo de Pêssego e Uva has 11.8 g.
- Only Fruit & Barley Summer Fruits lists: Apple, Gluten.
Ingredients
Sumo de Pêssego e Uva
55% polme de pêssego, 45% sumo de uva obtido apartir de um produto concentrado.
Fruit & Barley Summer Fruits
water, fruit juices from concentrate 10% ( apple 9%, strawberry 0.3%, plum, blackcurrant, cherry 0.1%), acids (citric acid, malic acid), refined barley flour (1%), acidity regulator (sodium citrate), sweeteners (acesulfame K, sucralose), preservatives (potassium sorbate, sodium metabisulphate), Vitamins (C, niacin, B6, D), natural flavouring, carrot concentrate, natural colour (anthocyanins).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sumo de Pêssego e Uva or Fruit & Barley Summer Fruits?
Overall, Fruit & Barley Summer Fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruit & Barley Summer Fruits has fewer calories: 5 kcal versus 55 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fruit & Barley Summer Fruits has less sugar: 0 g versus 11.8 g per 100 g.