Sumo de Pêssego e Uva vs Devin minerals zelena
Overall, Devin minerals zelena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Sumo de Pêssego e Uva | Devin minerals zelena |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 55 kcal | 16 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 11.8 g | 3.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Devin minerals zelena has 71% fewer calories (16 kcal vs 55 kcal).
- Devin minerals zelena has 67% less sugar (3.9 g vs 11.8 g).
- Sumo de Pêssego e Uva has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Sumo de Pêssego e Uva
55% polme de pêssego, 45% sumo de uva obtido apartir de um produto concentrado.
Devin minerals zelena
Минерална вода, флуктоза на прах, регулатор на киселинност: лимонена киселина; естествен ароматизант киви, естествен ароматизант ябълка; консерванти:калиев сорбат, натриев бензоат; подсладител: стевиол глюкозиди от Стевия; кофеин, минерал цинк (цинков глюконат), сироп от карамелизирана захар, гуарана екстракт, витамини: ниацин (никотинамид), пантотенова киселина (калциев D-пантотенат), витамин B6 (пиродоксин хидрохлорид), тиамин (тиамин хидрохлорид), фолиева киселина (птероилмоноглутаминова киселина), витамин B12 (цианокобаламин).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sumo de Pêssego e Uva or Devin minerals zelena?
Overall, Devin minerals zelena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Devin minerals zelena has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 55 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Devin minerals zelena has less sugar: 3.9 g versus 11.8 g per 100 g.