Summer Shine Pear & Guava Fruit Blend vs Arancia sanguinello
Overall, Summer Shine Pear & Guava Fruit Blend has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Summer Shine Pear & Guava Fruit Blend
Arancia sanguinello
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Summer Shine Pear & Guava Fr... | Arancia sanguinello |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 17 kcal | 38 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 7 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Summer Shine Pear & Guava Fruit Blend has 55% fewer calories (17 kcal vs 38 kcal).
- Summer Shine Pear & Guava Fruit Blend has 55% less sugar (3.6 g vs 8 g).
Ingredients
Summer Shine Pear & Guava Fruit Blend
Water, Fruit Juices from Concentrate (Pear 23%, White Guava 2%), Sugar, Acid (Citric Acid), Flavourings, Stabiliser (Xanthan Gum), Preservative (Potassium Sorbate), Colours (E171, E172), Safflower Extract, Antioxidant (Ascorbic Acid), Sweetener (Sucralose).
Arancia sanguinello
Wasser, Blutorangensaft aus Blutorangensaftkonzentrat 15%, Orangensaft aus Orangensaftkonzentrat 10%, Zucker, schwarzes Karotten - und schwarzes Johannisbeerenkonzentrat, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, natürliches Aroma, Vitamin C
FAQ
Which is healthier: Summer Shine Pear & Guava Fruit Blend or Arancia sanguinello?
Overall, Summer Shine Pear & Guava Fruit Blend has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Summer Shine Pear & Guava Fruit Blend has fewer calories: 17 kcal versus 38 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Summer Shine Pear & Guava Fruit Blend has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 8 g per 100 g.