PO PRO STU kompotowy AGREST CYTRYNA JABŁKO vs Arancia sanguinello
Overall, PO PRO STU kompotowy AGREST CYTRYNA JABŁKO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
PO PRO STU kompotowy AGREST CYTRYNA JABŁKO
Arancia sanguinello
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | PO PRO STU kompotowy AGREST... | Arancia sanguinello |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 20 kcal | 38 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.7 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- PO PRO STU kompotowy AGREST CYTRYNA JABŁKO has 47% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 38 kcal).
- PO PRO STU kompotowy AGREST CYTRYNA JABŁKO has 41% less sugar (4.7 g vs 8 g).
- PO PRO STU kompotowy AGREST CYTRYNA JABŁKO has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
PO PRO STU kompotowy AGREST CYTRYNA JABŁKO
Woda, soki z zagęszczonych soków z: jabłek (35,5 %) i agrestu (1 %), cukier trzcinowy, sok cytrynowy z zagęszczonego soku (0,5 %), naturalne aromaty.
Arancia sanguinello
Wasser, Blutorangensaft aus Blutorangensaftkonzentrat 15%, Orangensaft aus Orangensaftkonzentrat 10%, Zucker, schwarzes Karotten - und schwarzes Johannisbeerenkonzentrat, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, natürliches Aroma, Vitamin C
FAQ
Which is healthier: PO PRO STU kompotowy AGREST CYTRYNA JABŁKO or Arancia sanguinello?
Overall, PO PRO STU kompotowy AGREST CYTRYNA JABŁKO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
PO PRO STU kompotowy AGREST CYTRYNA JABŁKO has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 38 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
PO PRO STU kompotowy AGREST CYTRYNA JABŁKO has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 8 g per 100 g.