Comparison
Sultaninen vs Pasas sultanas
Overall, Pasas sultanas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sultaninen | Pasas sultanas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 329 kcal | 300 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 66 g | 67.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 5.2 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pasas sultanas has 45% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Pasas sultanas has 13% more fiber (5.2 g vs 4.5 g).
- Sultaninen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sultaninen
Sultaninen. Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten, Erdnüssen enthalten.
Pasas sultanas
99,5% sultanas, óleo de algodão.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sultaninen or Pasas sultanas?
Overall, Pasas sultanas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pasas sultanas has fewer calories: 300 kcal versus 329 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sultaninen has less sugar: 66 g versus 67.7 g per 100 g.