Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné vs Sucre de coco
Overall, Sucre de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre de Fleur de coco non r... | Sucre de coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 2 |
| Calories | 386 kcal | 387 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 95 g | 90 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre de coco has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Sucre de coco has 40% more fiber (1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has 45% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné
Sucre de sève de fleur de cocotier. Ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Sucre de coco
100 % sucre de fleur de noix de coco* (Cocos Nucifera) *Issu de l'Agriculture Biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné or Sucre de coco?
Overall, Sucre de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has fewer calories: 386 kcal versus 387 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre de coco has less sugar: 90 g versus 95 g per 100 g.