Comparison

Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné vs Sucre de canne complet non raffiné

Overall, Sucre de canne complet non raffiné has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSucre de Fleur de coco non r...Sucre de canne complet non r...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 2
Calories 386 kcal 387 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 95 g 68 g
Salt 0.3 g 0 g
Fiber 0.6 g 0 g
Protein 1.1 g 1.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sucre de canne complet non raffiné has no fat, while Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has 0.5 g.
  • Sucre de canne complet non raffiné has 28% less sugar (68 g vs 95 g).
  • Sucre de canne complet non raffiné has no salt, while Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has 0.3 g.
  • Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné

Sucre de sève de fleur de cocotier. Ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique.

Sucre de canne complet non raffiné

Sucre de canne complet (non raffiné) issu de l'agriculture biologique

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné or Sucre de canne complet non raffiné?

Overall, Sucre de canne complet non raffiné has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has fewer calories: 386 kcal versus 387 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sucre de canne complet non raffiné has less sugar: 68 g versus 95 g per 100 g.

More comparisons