Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G vs Sucre de fleur de Coco
Overall, Sucre de fleur de Coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G
Sucre de fleur de Coco
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre de fleur de coco en po... | Sucre de fleur de Coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 383 kcal | 388 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 90 g | 93 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre de fleur de Coco has 38% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G
Sucre de fleur de coco*. *ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Sucre de fleur de Coco
Sucre de fleur de coco biologique 100%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G or Sucre de fleur de Coco?
Overall, Sucre de fleur de Coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G has fewer calories: 383 kcal versus 388 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G has less sugar: 90 g versus 93 g per 100 g.