Comparison
Sucralose vs Sucralose
Overall, Sucralose has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucralose | Sucralose |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 386 kcal | 2 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucralose has 99% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 386 kcal).
- Sucralose has no fat, while Sucralose has 0.5 g.
- Sucralose has 93% less sugar (0.5 g vs 6.8 g).
- Sucralose has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Sucralose has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Sucralose
Maltodextrine, édulcorant : sucralose (1%).
Sucralose
Eau, édulcorants (sucralose, fructose), correcteur d'acuité E330, conservateur E202.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucralose or Sucralose?
Overall, Sucralose has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucralose has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 386 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucralose has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 6.8 g per 100 g.