Comparison

Sticks et bretzels d'Alsace vs Elephant Pretzels With Salt

Overall, Sticks et bretzels d'Alsace has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSticks et bretzels d'AlsaceElephant Pretzels With Salt
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 391 kcal 416 kcal
Fat 4.8 g 9.2 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.8 g
Sugars 3.2 g 6.6 g
Salt 2.8 g 2.8 g
Fiber 6.2 g —
Protein 10 g 9 g
Additives15
AllergensGlutenGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sticks et bretzels d'Alsace has 48% less fat (4.8 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Sticks et bretzels d'Alsace has 50% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Sticks et bretzels d'Alsace has 52% less sugar (3.2 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Sticks et bretzels d'Alsace has 10% more protein (10 g vs 9 g).
  • Sticks et bretzels d'Alsace has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Sticks et bretzels d'Alsace is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Elephant Pretzels With Salt lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Sticks et bretzels d'Alsace

Farine de BLE, extrait de malt d'ORGE, huile de tournesol, sel, levure, correcteur d'acidité (hydroxyde de sodium). Traces éventuelles de LAIT.

Elephant Pretzels With Salt

Farine de blé, huile végétale (colza), sucre, extrait de malt d'orge, sel de mer (2.8%), émulsifiant: lecithine de soja, agent levant: bicarbonate de sodium, antioxydant: extrait de romarin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sticks et bretzels d'Alsace or Elephant Pretzels With Salt?

Overall, Sticks et bretzels d'Alsace has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sticks et bretzels d'Alsace has fewer calories: 391 kcal versus 416 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sticks et bretzels d'Alsace has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons