Comparison

Steaks haché 5% vs Steaks Hachés 5% MG

Overall, Steaks Hachés 5% MG has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSteaks haché 5%Steaks Hachés 5% MG
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 240 kcal 122 kcal
Fat 12.4 g 5 g
Saturated fat 5.7 g 2 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 32.1 g 21 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Steaks Hachés 5% MG has 49% fewer calories (122 kcal vs 240 kcal).
  • Steaks Hachés 5% MG has 60% less fat (5 g vs 12.4 g).
  • Steaks Hachés 5% MG has 65% less saturated fat (2 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Steaks haché 5% has no sugar, while Steaks Hachés 5% MG has 0.5 g.
  • Steaks Hachés 5% MG has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Steaks haché 5% has 35% more protein (32.1 g vs 21 g).
  • Steaks Hachés 5% MG has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Steaks haché 5%

100 % viande bovine

Steaks Hachés 5% MG

Viande bovine hachée [origine : France].

FAQ

Which is healthier: Steaks haché 5% or Steaks Hachés 5% MG?

Overall, Steaks Hachés 5% MG has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Steaks Hachés 5% MG has fewer calories: 122 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Steaks haché 5% has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons