Comparison

Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 vs Steaks Hachés 5% MG

Overall, Steaks Hachés 5% MG has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSteaks hachés charolais FB 5...Steaks Hachés 5% MG
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 100 kcal 122 kcal
Fat 5 g 5 g
Saturated fat 2.2 g 2 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 20 g 21 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has 18% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 122 kcal).
  • Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has no sugar, while Steaks Hachés 5% MG has 0.5 g.
  • Steaks Hachés 5% MG has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Steaks Hachés 5% MG has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2

100% viande bovine

Steaks Hachés 5% MG

Viande bovine hachée [origine : France].

FAQ

Which is healthier: Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 or Steaks Hachés 5% MG?

Overall, Steaks Hachés 5% MG has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 122 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons