Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 vs Steaks hachés 5% pur Boeuf
Overall, Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2
Steaks hachés 5% pur Boeuf
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Steaks hachés charolais FB 5... | Steaks hachés 5% pur Boeuf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 100 kcal | 125 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has 20% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 125 kcal).
Ingredients
Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2
100% viande bovine
Steaks hachés 5% pur Boeuf
100% viande hachée de bœuf
FAQ
Which is healthier: Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 or Steaks hachés 5% pur Boeuf?
Overall, Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.