Comparison

Steaks hachés 5%MG vs Steaks haché 5%

Overall, Steaks hachés 5%MG has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Better choice
Steaks hachés 5%MG

Steaks hachés 5%MG

Charal · 2 x 130 g
b NOVA 1
Steaks haché 5%

Steaks haché 5%

Carrefour · 250 g (2 * 125 g)
c NOVA 1

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSteaks hachés 5%MGSteaks haché 5%
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 126 kcal 240 kcal
Fat 5 g 12.4 g
Saturated fat 2.2 g 5.7 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 20 g 32.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Steaks hachés 5%MG has 48% fewer calories (126 kcal vs 240 kcal).
  • Steaks hachés 5%MG has 60% less fat (5 g vs 12.4 g).
  • Steaks hachés 5%MG has 62% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Steaks haché 5% has 38% more protein (32.1 g vs 20 g).
  • Steaks hachés 5%MG has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Steaks hachés 5%MG

100% viande hachée de bœuf,

Steaks haché 5%

100 % viande bovine

FAQ

Which is healthier: Steaks hachés 5%MG or Steaks haché 5%?

Overall, Steaks hachés 5%MG has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Steaks hachés 5%MG has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Steaks hachés 5%MG has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Steaks hachés charolais... vs Steaks hachés 5%MG Steaks hachés 5%MG vs Steaks hachés 5% pur Boe... Steaks hachés 5%MG vs Steaks Hachés 5% MG Steaks hachés charolais... vs Steaks haché 5% 2 Steaks Hachés 5% M.G B... vs Steaks haché 5% Steaks Hachés 5% vs Steaks haché 5% 2 Steaks Hachés 5% M.G B... vs Steaks hachés 5%MG Steaks Hachés 5% vs Steaks hachés 5%MG