Comparison
Steak de cheval vs Macinato scelto equino
Overall, Steak de cheval has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Steak de cheval | Macinato scelto equino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 102 kcal | 108 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steak de cheval has no sugar, while Macinato scelto equino has 1.2 g.
- Steak de cheval has 84% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Steak de cheval has the better Nutri-Score.
- Steak de cheval is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Steak de cheval
Viande de cheval.
Macinato scelto equino
Carne di cavallo, antiossidante: E300, acido ascorbico, destrosio, saccarosio, sale.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Steak de cheval or Macinato scelto equino?
Overall, Steak de cheval has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steak de cheval has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 108 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Steak de cheval has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Sfilacci di equino vs Macinato scelto equino
Steak de cheval vs Sfilacci di equino
Macinato scelto equino vs Sfilacci di equino
Steak de cheval vs Sfilacci di equino
Warcollier vs Macinato scelto equino
Warcollier vs Steak de cheval
Salame di cavallo Ticino vs Macinato scelto equino
Salame di cavallo Ticino vs Steak de cheval