Comparison

Spieced kebab pieces vs Kebab de pollo precocinado y cortado

Overall, Spieced kebab pieces has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSpieced kebab piecesKebab de pollo precocinado y...
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 169 kcal 208 kcal
Fat 6.1 g 13.1 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 4.3 g
Sugars 1.8 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.5 g 2.2 g
Fiber 7.7 g 0 g
Protein 22.4 g 22 g
Additives02
AllergensSoybeansSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Spieced kebab pieces has 19% fewer calories (169 kcal vs 208 kcal).
  • Spieced kebab pieces has 53% less fat (6.1 g vs 13.1 g).
  • Spieced kebab pieces has 91% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Kebab de pollo precocinado y cortado has 72% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Spieced kebab pieces has 29% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Spieced kebab pieces has 100% more fiber (7.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Spieced kebab pieces has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Spieced kebab pieces

Water, CONCENTRATED SOYA PROTEIN (23%), Rapeseed Oil, Dextrose, Spices, Salt, Flavouring, Paprika.

Kebab de pollo precocinado y cortado

Carne de pollo (86%), agua, aglutinante (proteína de _soja_, acidulante (E-262), estabilizador (E-450), harina de patata), sal, especias y extractos de especias, jarabe de glucosa, azúcar, aromas, hierbas, tomate, extracto de levadura, maltodextrina.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Spieced kebab pieces or Kebab de pollo precocinado y cortado?

Overall, Spieced kebab pieces has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Spieced kebab pieces has fewer calories: 169 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kebab de pollo precocinado y cortado has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons