Spekulatius Schokolade vs Rocas de chocolate
Overall, Rocas de chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Spekulatius Schokolade | Rocas de chocolate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 570 kcal | 502 kcal |
| Fat | 37 g | 22.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 13.9 g |
| Sugars | 45 g | 57.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | — |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 4.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rocas de chocolate has 12% fewer calories (502 kcal vs 570 kcal).
- Rocas de chocolate has 39% less fat (22.4 g vs 37 g).
- Rocas de chocolate has 34% less saturated fat (13.9 g vs 21 g).
- Spekulatius Schokolade has 22% less sugar (45 g vs 57.5 g).
- Spekulatius Schokolade has 33% more protein (7.3 g vs 4.9 g).
- Only Spekulatius Schokolade lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Spekulatius Schokolade
Rohrohrzucker*, Kakaobutter*, Spekulatius* 12% (WEIZENMEHL*, Sonnenblumenöl*, Rohrohrzucker*, Zuckerrübensirup*, Gewürze*), VOLLMILCHPULVER*, Kakaomasse*, SAHNEPULVER*, MAGERMILCHPULVER*, Bourbonvanilleextrakt* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Mandel, Haselnuss, Pecannuss und Pistazie enthalten.
Rocas de chocolate
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spekulatius Schokolade or Rocas de chocolate?
Overall, Rocas de chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rocas de chocolate has fewer calories: 502 kcal versus 570 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Spekulatius Schokolade has less sugar: 45 g versus 57.5 g per 100 g.