Comparison

Weihnachtsmaus - Milchmäuse mit Milchcreme-Schicht vs Rocas de chocolate

Overall, Rocas de chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWeihnachtsmaus - Milchmäuse...Rocas de chocolate
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — —
Calories 571 kcal 502 kcal
Fat 37 g 22.4 g
Saturated fat 23 g 13.9 g
Sugars 50 g 57.5 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 1.1 g —
Protein 7.7 g 4.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rocas de chocolate has 12% fewer calories (502 kcal vs 571 kcal).
  • Rocas de chocolate has 39% less fat (22.4 g vs 37 g).
  • Rocas de chocolate has 40% less saturated fat (13.9 g vs 23 g).
  • Weihnachtsmaus - Milchmäuse mit Milchcreme-Schicht has 13% less sugar (50 g vs 57.5 g).
  • Weihnachtsmaus - Milchmäuse mit Milchcreme-Schicht has 36% more protein (7.7 g vs 4.9 g).

Ingredients

Weihnachtsmaus - Milchmäuse mit Milchcreme-Schicht

Not available.

Rocas de chocolate

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Weihnachtsmaus - Milchmäuse mit Milchcreme-Schicht or Rocas de chocolate?

Overall, Rocas de chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rocas de chocolate has fewer calories: 502 kcal versus 571 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Weihnachtsmaus - Milchmäuse mit Milchcreme-Schicht has less sugar: 50 g versus 57.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons