Choco Lolly vs Rocas de chocolate
Overall, Rocas de chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Choco Lolly | Rocas de chocolate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 543 kcal | 502 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 22.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 13.9 g |
| Sugars | 57 g | 57.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 4.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rocas de chocolate has 30% less fat (22.4 g vs 32 g).
- Rocas de chocolate has 27% less saturated fat (13.9 g vs 19 g).
- Choco Lolly has 18% more protein (6 g vs 4.9 g).
- Only Choco Lolly lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Choco Lolly
Sucre, beurre de cacao, 16% lait entieren poudre, pâte de cacao, lactose (lait), poudre de lactosérum doux (lait), émulsifiant: lécithines (soja). Chocolat au lait: cacao: 30% minimum; matière sèche issue du lait: 25% minimum. Chocolat blanc: beurre de cacao: 30% minimum; matière sèche issue du lait: 14% minimum. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque et de céréales contenant du gluten.
Rocas de chocolate
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Choco Lolly or Rocas de chocolate?
Overall, Rocas de chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rocas de chocolate has fewer calories: 502 kcal versus 543 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Choco Lolly has less sugar: 57 g versus 57.5 g per 100 g.