Comparison

Soupe de poissons vs Soupe de Poissons Label Rouge

Overall, Soupe de poissons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSoupe de poissonsSoupe de Poissons Label Roug...
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 35 kcal 48 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0.2 g
Salt 0.8 g 1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 4.9 g 6.6 g
Additives11
AllergensCelery, Crustaceans, FishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Soupe de poissons has 27% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 48 kcal).
  • Soupe de poissons has 47% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Soupe de Poissons Label Rouge has 75% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Soupe de Poissons Label Rouge has 26% more protein (6.6 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Soupe de poissons is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Soupe de poissons lists: Celery, Crustaceans.

Ingredients

Soupe de poissons

Eau, poissons péchés en Atlantique Nord Est 35% concentré de tomates, carottes, oignons, vin blanc, langoustines (conservateur : sulfite de sodium), poireaux, sel, céleri, homard persil, ail, thym, laurier, piment fort, paprika, safran.

Soupe de Poissons Label Rouge

Eau, poissons: 40% (lieu noir, grondin, tacaud, merlan, dorade-sébaste), amidon de maïs, tomate, arômes naturels, sel, amidon modifié de maïs, plantes aromatiques, safran : 0,02%. Poissons pêchés en Atlantique Nord-Est (zone FAO 27)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Soupe de poissons or Soupe de Poissons Label Rouge?

Overall, Soupe de poissons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Soupe de poissons has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 48 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Soupe de Poissons Label Rouge has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons