Soupe de poisson vs Soupe de Poissons Label Rouge
Overall, Soupe de poisson has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Soupe de poisson | Soupe de Poissons Label Roug... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 35 kcal | 48 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 6.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Celery, Crustaceans, Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Soupe de poisson has 27% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 48 kcal).
- Soupe de poisson has 47% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Soupe de Poissons Label Rouge has 75% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Soupe de Poissons Label Rouge has 26% more protein (6.6 g vs 4.9 g).
- Soupe de poisson is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Soupe de poisson lists: Celery, Crustaceans.
Ingredients
Soupe de poisson
Eau, poisons , concentré de tomates, carottes, oignons, vin blanc, langoustines, poireaux, sel, céleri, homard, persil, ail, thym, laurier, piment fort, paprika, safran.
Soupe de Poissons Label Rouge
Eau, poissons: 40% (lieu noir, grondin, tacaud, merlan, dorade-sébaste), amidon de maïs, tomate, arômes naturels, sel, amidon modifié de maïs, plantes aromatiques, safran : 0,02%. Poissons pêchés en Atlantique Nord-Est (zone FAO 27)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Soupe de poisson or Soupe de Poissons Label Rouge?
Overall, Soupe de poisson has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Soupe de poisson has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 48 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Soupe de Poissons Label Rouge has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.