Comparison

Soßenbinder hell vs For Chicken Gravy Granules

Overall, Soßenbinder hell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSoßenbinder hellFor Chicken Gravy Granules
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 369 kcal 45 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 2.8 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 1.9 g
Sugars 26 g 0.1 g
Salt 0 g 1.2 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.1 g
Protein 0.6 g 0.3 g
Additives04
AllergensMilkGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • For Chicken Gravy Granules has 88% fewer calories (45 kcal vs 369 kcal).
  • Soßenbinder hell has 82% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Soßenbinder hell has 95% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.9 g).
  • For Chicken Gravy Granules has 100% less sugar (0.1 g vs 26 g).
  • Soßenbinder hell has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Soßenbinder hell has 74% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Soßenbinder hell has 55% more protein (0.6 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Only Soßenbinder hell lists: Milk.
  • Only For Chicken Gravy Granules lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Soßenbinder hell

Kartoffelstärke, Milchzucker, Maltodextrin, Reismehl

For Chicken Gravy Granules

potato starch, palm oill wheat flour (wheat flour, carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin), salt, flavourings colour (plain caramel), barley malt extract, emulsifier soya lecithins), citric acid. allergy advice for allergens, including cereals containing gluten, ingredients in bold.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Soßenbinder hell or For Chicken Gravy Granules?

Overall, Soßenbinder hell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

For Chicken Gravy Granules has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 369 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

For Chicken Gravy Granules has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 26 g per 100 g.

More comparisons