Comparison
Fruttina extra vs Soßenbinder hell
Overall, Fruttina extra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fruttina extra | Soßenbinder hell |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | 4 |
| Calories | 172 kcal | 369 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 40 g | 26 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruttina extra has 53% fewer calories (172 kcal vs 369 kcal).
- Soßenbinder hell has 35% less sugar (26 g vs 40 g).
- Fruttina extra has 75% more fiber (2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Fruttina extra is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Soßenbinder hell lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Fruttina extra
Sucre, 1.1% pectines de fruit, acide citrique, acide sorbique
Soßenbinder hell
Kartoffelstärke, Milchzucker, Maltodextrin, Reismehl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruttina extra or Soßenbinder hell?
Overall, Fruttina extra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruttina extra has fewer calories: 172 kcal versus 369 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Soßenbinder hell has less sugar: 26 g versus 40 g per 100 g.