Comparison
Agar-Agar vs Soßenbinder hell
Overall, Agar-Agar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Agar-Agar | Soßenbinder hell |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 26 kcal | 369 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 26 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Agar-Agar has 93% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 369 kcal).
- Agar-Agar has no fat, while Soßenbinder hell has 0.5 g.
- Agar-Agar has 99% less sugar (0.3 g vs 26 g).
- Agar-Agar is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Soßenbinder hell lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Agar-Agar
100% agar-agar.
Soßenbinder hell
Kartoffelstärke, Milchzucker, Maltodextrin, Reismehl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Agar-Agar or Soßenbinder hell?
Overall, Agar-Agar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Agar-Agar has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 369 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Agar-Agar has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 26 g per 100 g.