Comparison
Sødergården vs Butterschmalz
Overall, Sødergården has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sødergården | Butterschmalz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 594 kcal | 898 kcal |
| Fat | 65 g | 99.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 34 g | 62.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sødergården has 34% fewer calories (594 kcal vs 898 kcal).
- Sødergården has 35% less fat (65 g vs 99.8 g).
- Sødergården has 46% less saturated fat (34 g vs 62.5 g).
- Butterschmalz has no sugar, while Sødergården has 1.4 g.
- Sødergården has 100% more protein (0.8 g vs 0 g).
- Sødergården has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Butterschmalz lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Sødergården
63% mildgesäuerte Butter, Wasser, 13% Rapsöl, Milchsäurekulturen (enthält Milch).
Butterschmalz
Butterreinfett, 99,8% Fett
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sødergården or Butterschmalz?
Overall, Sødergården has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sødergården has fewer calories: 594 kcal versus 898 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Butterschmalz has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Butterschmalz vs Slightly Salted Spreadab...
Kaergarden ungesalzen XL... vs Butterschmalz
Sødergården vs Yeo Valley Salted Butter
Butterschmalz vs Yeo Valley Salted Butter
British spreadable butte... vs Butterschmalz
British spreadable butte... vs Sødergården
Sødergården vs Tesco Salted Spreadable
Butterschmalz vs Tesco Salted Spreadable