British spreadable butter vs Butterschmalz
Overall, British spreadable butter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | British spreadable butter | Butterschmalz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 662 kcal | 898 kcal |
| Fat | 72.3 g | 99.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 33.8 g | 62.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- British spreadable butter has 26% fewer calories (662 kcal vs 898 kcal).
- British spreadable butter has 28% less fat (72.3 g vs 99.8 g).
- British spreadable butter has 46% less saturated fat (33.8 g vs 62.5 g).
- Butterschmalz has no salt, while British spreadable butter has 1.1 g.
- British spreadable butter has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Butterschmalz is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
British spreadable butter
54% Butter (Milk), 33% Rapeseed Oil, Water, 1% Salt, Colour: Carotenes.
Butterschmalz
Butterreinfett, 99,8% Fett
FAQ
Which is healthier: British spreadable butter or Butterschmalz?
Overall, British spreadable butter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
British spreadable butter has fewer calories: 662 kcal versus 898 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Butterschmalz has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.