Comparison

Sobrassada de Mallorca vs Fouet Extra "Le Catalan"

Overall, Fouet Extra "Le Catalan" has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSobrassada de MallorcaFouet Extra "Le Catalan...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 577 kcal 465 kcal
Fat 67 g 38.2 g
Saturated fat 30 g 13.7 g
Sugars 0.5 g 2.1 g
Salt 2 g 5.2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 8.5 g 27.9 g
Additives26
AllergensNone listedMilk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fouet Extra "Le Catalan" has 19% fewer calories (465 kcal vs 577 kcal).
  • Fouet Extra "Le Catalan" has 43% less fat (38.2 g vs 67 g).
  • Fouet Extra "Le Catalan" has 54% less saturated fat (13.7 g vs 30 g).
  • Sobrassada de Mallorca has 76% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Sobrassada de Mallorca has 62% less salt (2 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Fouet Extra "Le Catalan" has 70% more protein (27.9 g vs 8.5 g).
  • Only Fouet Extra "Le Catalan" lists: Milk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Sobrassada de Mallorca

Lard fraîche de porc (58%), E-320, E-321, viande fraîche de porc (35%), paprika, sel, dextrose, poivre noir. Boyaux en collagène.

Fouet Extra "Le Catalan"

Maigre et gras de porc, sel, lactose, PROTÉINES DE LAIT, maltodextrine de maïs, dextrose, antioxydants (E-331, E-316), épices, conservateurs (E-250, E-252), dextrine, colorant (E-120) et vin (SULFITES).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sobrassada de Mallorca or Fouet Extra "Le Catalan"?

Overall, Fouet Extra "Le Catalan" has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fouet Extra "Le Catalan" has fewer calories: 465 kcal versus 577 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sobrassada de Mallorca has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons