Comparison

Sobrasada de mallorca vs Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst

Overall, Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSobrasada de mallorcaHademarscher Schinkenmettwur...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 609 kcal 125 kcal
Fat 63 g 3 g
Saturated fat 23 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.2 g 3.1 g
Fiber 0.1 g —
Protein 10 g 24 g
Additives22
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has 79% fewer calories (125 kcal vs 609 kcal).
  • Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has 95% less fat (3 g vs 63 g).
  • Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has 94% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 23 g).
  • Sobrasada de mallorca has 29% less salt (2.2 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has 58% more protein (24 g vs 10 g).
  • Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Sobrasada de mallorca

61 % Schweinespeck, 31 % Schweinefleisch, 5 % Paprikapulver, Speisesalz, Dextrose, natürliches Rosmarin-Aroma, Antioxidationsmittel: Stark tocopherolhaltige Extrakte, Fettsäureester der Ascorbinsäure; Reifungskulturen.

Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst

Schweinefleisch, Speisesalz, Gewürze, Dextrose, Glukosesirup, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Reifekulturen, Buchenholzrauch.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sobrasada de mallorca or Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst?

Overall, Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has fewer calories: 125 kcal versus 609 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sobrasada de mallorca has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons