Hallig Mettwurst vs Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst
Overall, Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hallig Mettwurst | Hademarscher Schinkenmettwur... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 318 kcal | 125 kcal |
| Fat | 22.9 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4.2 g | 3.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 26.5 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has 61% fewer calories (125 kcal vs 318 kcal).
- Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has 87% less fat (3 g vs 22.9 g).
- Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has 86% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 9.1 g).
- Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has 26% less salt (3.1 g vs 4.2 g).
- Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Hallig Mettwurst
Schweinefleisch, Speisesalz, Gewürze (Pfeffer), Dextrose, Saccharose, Glucosesirup, Starterkulturen, Konservierungsstoff. Natriumnitrit, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure, Natriumascorbat, Aroma, Buchenholzrauch.
Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst
Schweinefleisch, Speisesalz, Gewürze, Dextrose, Glukosesirup, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Reifekulturen, Buchenholzrauch.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hallig Mettwurst or Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst?
Overall, Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hademarscher Schinkenmettwurst has fewer calories: 125 kcal versus 318 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hallig Mettwurst has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.