Hallig Mettwurst vs Picnics Knoblauch XL Pack
Overall, Hallig Mettwurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Hallig Mettwurst
Picnics Knoblauch XL Pack
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hallig Mettwurst | Picnics Knoblauch XL Pack |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 318 kcal | 482 kcal |
| Fat | 22.9 g | 38.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.1 g | 15.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 4.2 g | 4.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 26.5 g | 31 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hallig Mettwurst has 34% fewer calories (318 kcal vs 482 kcal).
- Hallig Mettwurst has 41% less fat (22.9 g vs 38.7 g).
- Hallig Mettwurst has 42% less saturated fat (9.1 g vs 15.6 g).
- Hallig Mettwurst has 87% less sugar (0.3 g vs 2.3 g).
- Picnics Knoblauch XL Pack has 15% more protein (31 g vs 26.5 g).
- Only Picnics Knoblauch XL Pack lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Hallig Mettwurst
Schweinefleisch, Speisesalz, Gewürze (Pfeffer), Dextrose, Saccharose, Glucosesirup, Starterkulturen, Konservierungsstoff. Natriumnitrit, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure, Natriumascorbat, Aroma, Buchenholzrauch.
Picnics Knoblauch XL Pack
Schweinefleisch, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Dextrose, Gewürze (enthalten Senf), Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit, Schafsaitling, Buchenholzrauch.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hallig Mettwurst or Picnics Knoblauch XL Pack?
Overall, Hallig Mettwurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hallig Mettwurst has fewer calories: 318 kcal versus 482 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hallig Mettwurst has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.