Slimfast Original Rich Chocolate Royale vs Original
Overall, Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Slimfast Original Rich Choco... | Original |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 423 kcal | 357 kcal |
| Fat | 15.4 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 38.5 g | 16 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 15.4 g | 17 g |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 31 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Original has 16% fewer calories (357 kcal vs 423 kcal).
- Original has 22% less fat (12 g vs 15.4 g).
- Original has 32% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 1.9 g).
- Original has 58% less sugar (16 g vs 38.5 g).
- Original has 75% more protein (31 g vs 7.7 g).
Ingredients
Slimfast Original Rich Chocolate Royale
Not available.
Original
Erbsenprotein, Reissirup, Sonnenblumenkerne, Kürbiskernprotein, Sonnenblumenprotein, Polydextrose, Grünkohlpulver, Süßungsmittel (Maltitolsirup auf Malzbasis), Inulin (aus Topinambur), Karottensaftpulver, Raffiniertes Öl aus Buglossoides, Lithothamnium Calverum (Rotalge), Acerolapulver, Sonnenblumenlecithin, D - Ribose, Salz, Traubenkernmehl, Bierhefe, Kelp (Meeresalge), Organische Vitamin D2-Hefe, Organische Zink-Hefe, Natürliches Vitamin E-Öl, Natürliches Vitamin K2 (MK-7 Menatto), Organische Selen-Hefe.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Slimfast Original Rich Chocolate Royale or Original?
Overall, Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Original has fewer calories: 357 kcal versus 423 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Original has less sugar: 16 g versus 38.5 g per 100 g.