Comparison

Sirop de chataignes vs Castagne sciroppate al naturale

Overall, Castagne sciroppate al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSirop de chataignesCastagne sciroppate al natur...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 352 kcal 237 kcal
Fat 0 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.2 g
Sugars 62 g 31.4 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 2.3 g
Additives20
AllergensNuts, Sulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Castagne sciroppate al naturale has 33% fewer calories (237 kcal vs 352 kcal).
  • Sirop de chataignes has no fat, while Castagne sciroppate al naturale has 1.5 g.
  • Castagne sciroppate al naturale has 49% less sugar (31.4 g vs 62 g).
  • Castagne sciroppate al naturale has 100% more protein (2.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Sirop de chataignes lists: Nuts, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Sirop de chataignes

Sucre liquide, eau, arômes (sulfites), châtaignes, colorant : caramel E150a, conservateur : E202. Sugar syrup, water, flavouring (sulfites), chestnut, colouring : caramel E150a, preservative agent: E202

Castagne sciroppate al naturale

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sirop de chataignes or Castagne sciroppate al naturale?

Overall, Castagne sciroppate al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Castagne sciroppate al naturale has fewer calories: 237 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Castagne sciroppate al naturale has less sugar: 31.4 g versus 62 g per 100 g.

More comparisons