Comparison

Sirop de chataîgnes vs Castagne sciroppate al naturale

Overall, Castagne sciroppate al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSirop de chataîgnesCastagne sciroppate al natur...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — —
Calories 305 kcal 237 kcal
Fat 0 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.2 g
Sugars 76 g 31.4 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 2.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Castagne sciroppate al naturale has 22% fewer calories (237 kcal vs 305 kcal).
  • Sirop de chataîgnes has no fat, while Castagne sciroppate al naturale has 1.5 g.
  • Castagne sciroppate al naturale has 59% less sugar (31.4 g vs 76 g).
  • Castagne sciroppate al naturale has 100% more protein (2.3 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Sirop de chataîgnes

Not available.

Castagne sciroppate al naturale

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sirop de chataîgnes or Castagne sciroppate al naturale?

Overall, Castagne sciroppate al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Castagne sciroppate al naturale has fewer calories: 237 kcal versus 305 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Castagne sciroppate al naturale has less sugar: 31.4 g versus 76 g per 100 g.

More comparisons