Sirop de châtaigne vs Castagne sciroppate al naturale
Overall, Castagne sciroppate al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sirop de châtaigne | Castagne sciroppate al natur... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 237 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 81 g | 31.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Castagne sciroppate al naturale has 34% fewer calories (237 kcal vs 357 kcal).
- Sirop de châtaigne has no fat, while Castagne sciroppate al naturale has 1.5 g.
- Castagne sciroppate al naturale has 61% less sugar (31.4 g vs 81 g).
- Castagne sciroppate al naturale has 100% more protein (2.3 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Sirop de châtaigne
Sirop de sucre et de glucose fructose, eau, infusion de Chataigne AÔP d'Ardèche (1,8 %), arôme naturel, acidifiant : Acide citrique, colorant : caramel ordinaire.
Castagne sciroppate al naturale
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sirop de châtaigne or Castagne sciroppate al naturale?
Overall, Castagne sciroppate al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Castagne sciroppate al naturale has fewer calories: 237 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Castagne sciroppate al naturale has less sugar: 31.4 g versus 81 g per 100 g.