Comparison
Silken vs Silken tofu
Overall, Silken tofu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Silken | Silken tofu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 42 kcal | 46 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 4.3 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Silken tofu has 19% more protein (5.3 g vs 4.3 g).
- Only Silken tofu lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Silken
Not available.
Silken tofu
Water, soybeans, stabiliser: E516, acidity regulator: E575
FAQ
Which is healthier: Silken or Silken tofu?
Overall, Silken tofu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Silken has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Silken has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.