Semoule de riz vs Sémola de arroz
Overall, Sémola de arroz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Semoule de riz | Sémola de arroz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 342 kcal | 343 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 6.8 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sémola de arroz has 75% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2 g).
- Sémola de arroz has 19% more protein (8.4 g vs 6.8 g).
Ingredients
Semoule de riz
Not available.
Sémola de arroz
Sémola de arroz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Semoule de riz or Sémola de arroz?
Overall, Sémola de arroz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Semoule de riz has fewer calories: 342 kcal versus 343 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sémola de arroz has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.