Comparison
Semmelbrösel vs Semmelbrösel
Overall, Semmelbrösel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Semmelbrösel | Semmelbrösel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 4.4 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 3.8 g |
| Fiber | 8.8 g | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Semmelbrösel has 20% less sugar (3.5 g vs 4.4 g).
- Semmelbrösel has 60% less salt (1.5 g vs 3.8 g).
- Semmelbrösel has 59% more fiber (8.8 g vs 3.6 g).
- Semmelbrösel has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Semmelbrösel
_Weizenmehl_, Hefe, Salz,
Semmelbrösel
Weizenmehl, Salz unjodiert, Hefe.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Semmelbrösel or Semmelbrösel?
Overall, Semmelbrösel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Semmelbrösel has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Semmelbrösel has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.