Comparison
Sekt vs Nealkoholické šumivé víno
Overall, Sekt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Sekt | Nealkoholické šumivé víno |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 26 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sekt has no calories, while Nealkoholické šumivé víno has 26 kcal.
- Sekt has no fat, while Nealkoholické šumivé víno has 0.5 g.
- Sekt has no sugar, while Nealkoholické šumivé víno has 6 g.
- Nealkoholické šumivé víno has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Sekt
Sekt
Nealkoholické šumivé víno
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sekt or Nealkoholické šumivé víno?
Overall, Sekt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sekt has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 26 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sekt has less sugar: 0 g versus 6 g per 100 g.