Hugo Cocktail vs Nealkoholické šumivé víno
Overall, Nealkoholické šumivé víno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hugo Cocktail | Nealkoholické šumivé víno |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 69 kcal | 26 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nealkoholické šumivé víno has 62% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 69 kcal).
- Nealkoholické šumivé víno has 14% less sugar (6 g vs 7 g).
- Only Hugo Cocktail lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Hugo Cocktail
Wein (Trauben, Säureregulatoren: enthält Weinsäure und/oder Äpfelsäure und/oder Citronensäure; Antioxidationsmittel: SULFITE), Wasser, Saccharose, Kohlendioxid, natürliche Aromen, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Antioxidationsmittel: SULFITE.
Nealkoholické šumivé víno
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hugo Cocktail or Nealkoholické šumivé víno?
Overall, Nealkoholické šumivé víno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nealkoholické šumivé víno has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 69 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nealkoholické šumivé víno has less sugar: 6 g versus 7 g per 100 g.