Hugo Cocktail vs Sekt
Overall, Sekt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hugo Cocktail | Sekt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 69 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | — |
| Sugars | 7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sekt has no calories, while Hugo Cocktail has 69 kcal.
- Sekt has no fat, while Hugo Cocktail has 0.5 g.
- Sekt has no sugar, while Hugo Cocktail has 7 g.
- Hugo Cocktail has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Sekt is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Hugo Cocktail lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Hugo Cocktail
Wein (Trauben, Säureregulatoren: enthält Weinsäure und/oder Äpfelsäure und/oder Citronensäure; Antioxidationsmittel: SULFITE), Wasser, Saccharose, Kohlendioxid, natürliche Aromen, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Antioxidationsmittel: SULFITE.
Sekt
Sekt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hugo Cocktail or Sekt?
Overall, Sekt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sekt has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 69 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sekt has less sugar: 0 g versus 7 g per 100 g.