Comparison
Sekt vs Sekt halbtrocken
Overall, Sekt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Sekt | Sekt halbtrocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 16 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sekt has no calories, while Sekt halbtrocken has 16 kcal.
Ingredients
Sekt
Sekt
Sekt halbtrocken
SEKT
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sekt or Sekt halbtrocken?
Overall, Sekt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sekt has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 16 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sekt has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.