Comparison
Scialatielli vs Scialatielli
Overall, Scialatielli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Scialatielli | Scialatielli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 253 kcal | 273 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Scialatielli has 41% less fat (1.3 g vs 2.2 g).
- Scialatielli has no saturated fat, while Scialatielli has 0.3 g.
- Scialatielli has 38% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.4 g).
- Scialatielli has 100% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Scialatielli
Not available.
Scialatielli
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Scialatielli or Scialatielli?
Overall, Scialatielli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Scialatielli has fewer calories: 253 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Scialatielli has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.