Italiamo scialatielli vs Scialatielli
Overall, Italiamo scialatielli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Italiamo scialatielli | Scialatielli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 254 kcal | 253 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 8.6 g | 9.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Italiamo scialatielli has 86% less fat (0.3 g vs 2.2 g).
- Italiamo scialatielli has 42% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2.4 g).
- Scialatielli has 12% more protein (9.8 g vs 8.6 g).
Ingredients
Italiamo scialatielli
Not available.
Scialatielli
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Italiamo scialatielli or Scialatielli?
Overall, Italiamo scialatielli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Scialatielli has fewer calories: 253 kcal versus 254 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Italiamo scialatielli has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.