Scialatielli vs Scialatielli al limone
Overall, Scialatielli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Scialatielli | Scialatielli al limone |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 253 kcal | 363 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 12.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Scialatielli has 30% fewer calories (253 kcal vs 363 kcal).
- Scialatielli al limone has 27% less fat (1.6 g vs 2.2 g).
- Scialatielli has no saturated fat, while Scialatielli al limone has 0.3 g.
- Scialatielli has 33% less sugar (2.4 g vs 3.6 g).
- Scialatielli al limone has 21% more protein (12.4 g vs 9.8 g).
Ingredients
Scialatielli
Not available.
Scialatielli al limone
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Scialatielli or Scialatielli al limone?
Overall, Scialatielli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Scialatielli has fewer calories: 253 kcal versus 363 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Scialatielli has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.