Comparison
Scialatielli vs Scialatielli
Overall, Scialatielli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Scialatielli | Scialatielli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 273 kcal | 359 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Scialatielli has 24% fewer calories (273 kcal vs 359 kcal).
- Scialatielli has 28% less fat (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Scialatielli has 20% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Scialatielli has 22% more fiber (3.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Scialatielli has 31% more protein (13 g vs 9 g).
Ingredients
Scialatielli
Not available.
Scialatielli
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Scialatielli or Scialatielli?
Overall, Scialatielli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Scialatielli has fewer calories: 273 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Scialatielli has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.