Comparison
Scialatielli vs Scialatielli
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Scialatielli | Scialatielli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 309 kcal | 359 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 9.3 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Scialatielli has 14% fewer calories (309 kcal vs 359 kcal).
- Scialatielli has 28% less fat (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Scialatielli has 44% more fiber (3.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Scialatielli has 28% more protein (13 g vs 9.3 g).
Ingredients
Scialatielli
Not available.
Scialatielli
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Scialatielli or Scialatielli?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Scialatielli has fewer calories: 309 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Scialatielli has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.