Schuiten zoet vs Pehmeä lakritsi
Overall, Schuiten zoet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schuiten zoet | Pehmeä lakritsi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 325 kcal | 310 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 50 g | 48 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 14 g | — |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 3.7 g |
| Additives | 5 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schuiten zoet has 67% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Schuiten zoet has 80% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Schuiten zoet has 23% more protein (4.8 g vs 3.7 g).
- Schuiten zoet has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pehmeä lakritsi lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Schuiten zoet
Suiker, glucose-fructosestroop, geleermiddel: Arabische gom; maïszetmeel, gemodificeerd zetmeel (aardappel), gelatine (varken), 3,3% zoethoutwortelextract, kleurstof: karamel; salmiak - zout, glansmiddel: carnaubawas; natuurlijke aroma's.
Pehmeä lakritsi
sokeri, VEHNÄjauho, melassi, glukoosisiirappi, lakritsiuute, väri (E153), suola, anisöljy
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schuiten zoet or Pehmeä lakritsi?
Overall, Schuiten zoet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pehmeä lakritsi has fewer calories: 310 kcal versus 325 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pehmeä lakritsi has less sugar: 48 g versus 50 g per 100 g.