Schuiten zoet vs Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet
Overall, Schuiten zoet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schuiten zoet | Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 325 kcal | 320 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 50 g | 47 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 14 g | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schuiten zoet has 82% less fat (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).
- Schuiten zoet has 59% more fiber (14 g vs 5.8 g).
- Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Schuiten zoet
Suiker, glucose-fructosestroop, geleermiddel: Arabische gom; maïszetmeel, gemodificeerd zetmeel (aardappel), gelatine (varken), 3,3% zoethoutwortelextract, kleurstof: karamel; salmiak - zout, glansmiddel: carnaubawas; natuurlijke aroma's.
Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet
Syrup/Syrup. molasses/molasses, wheat flour wheat flour wheat flour, oat bran oat bran, licorice - extract/licorice extract/licorice extract (3%), carbomedicinalis (vegetable charcoal), anise oil/anise oil/anise oil.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schuiten zoet or Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet?
Overall, Schuiten zoet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 325 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has less sugar: 47 g versus 50 g per 100 g.