Schuiten zoet vs Suijervrij katjesdrop
Overall, Suijervrij katjesdrop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schuiten zoet | Suijervrij katjesdrop |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 325 kcal | 204 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 50 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 14 g | 39 g |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 5 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Suijervrij katjesdrop has 37% fewer calories (204 kcal vs 325 kcal).
- Schuiten zoet has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Suijervrij katjesdrop has 99% less sugar (0.3 g vs 50 g).
- Suijervrij katjesdrop has 64% more fiber (39 g vs 14 g).
- Schuiten zoet has 75% more protein (4.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Suijervrij katjesdrop has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Schuiten zoet
Suiker, glucose-fructosestroop, geleermiddel: Arabische gom; maïszetmeel, gemodificeerd zetmeel (aardappel), gelatine (varken), 3,3% zoethoutwortelextract, kleurstof: karamel; salmiak - zout, glansmiddel: carnaubawas; natuurlijke aroma's.
Suijervrij katjesdrop
Zoetstof (steviolglycosiden [E960], diglyceriden van vetzuren [E471]), zout, natuurlijk aroma, plantaardige olie (kokos, koolzaad), aroma, glansmiddel [E414]), water, zoethoutextract, emulgator (mono - en (bijenwas (E901), carnaubawas [E903]).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schuiten zoet or Suijervrij katjesdrop?
Overall, Suijervrij katjesdrop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Suijervrij katjesdrop has fewer calories: 204 kcal versus 325 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Suijervrij katjesdrop has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 50 g per 100 g.